The Sovereign GPU Dividend

The Token Clock

In 1833 Britain paid the slave owners in full, up front — and borrowed to do it. The enslaved received nothing. This clock shows what the same instrument, pointed the other way, could raise from a levy on commercial AI.

No direct levy on any household.

since 21 July 2026

—
Times viewed
—
Times shared or embedded
AI tokens generated worldwide (est.)
0
—
They were paid in full. Up front.
1833 — paid to the slave owners
£20,000,000
≈ 40% of the government's total annual expenditure that year (HM Treasury, FOI2018-00186). Awards paid out between October 1836 and February 1843 — inside the claimants' own lifetimes (Bank of England). Britain borrowed to do it. HM Treasury: "Money borrowed to fund the Slavery Abolition Act (1835) was therefore fully repaid in 2015."
Paid to the enslaved
£0
Around 46,000 claims were heard (UCL Legacies of British Slavery). Not one was brought by a person who had been enslaved. They had no standing to appear.
The same instrument, pointed the other way

Not a trickle. The levy is ring-fenced in statute and borrowed against — Reparation Bonds raise the money now, as one payment, and the levy pays the bonds off over decades. Exactly what Britain did after 1833.

Paper: 3–5% More could be asked
Raised up front · 3%
£0
50-year Reparation Bonds
Raised up front · 5%
£0
50-year Reparation Bonds
What a timid rate leaves on the table
£0
Drag it. The paper sets the levy at 3–5% of billed inference. The slider is a suggestion, not a ceiling: the slave owners were not offered a cautious fraction, and nothing obliges this instrument to be timid. Above a flat few percent, the honest way to ask for more is a graduated levy — light on cheap tokens, heavier on high-margin frontier tokens — so the base is not shrunk by the price rising.
Figures are today's usage only, held flat. The paper's own central and agentic scenarios, which let the AI economy grow as the industry forecasts, put the up-front figure between $150 billion and about $1 trillion (working paper v6, §6).
Levy accrued since the paper was published
£0
Elapsed since publication
00:00:00
Working paper first published on Zenodo, July 2026 · doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21476320
The balance
Not reduced by a penny of this. Every payment is an instalment against an outstanding balance — and the balance stays on the books.
The whole plan
1

The levy

3–5% of what companies are billed for commercial AI inference — a printed line on the invoice, collected by the handful of firms that already meter every token. No direct levy on any household.

2

Paid up front

The stream is ring-fenced in statute and borrowed against. Reparation Bonds raise the money now, in one payment — as the slave owners were paid — and the levy services the bonds for decades.

3

It grows

The fund grows with the technology. As AI buys from AI, the base widens with no human in the loop. And any state can adopt the same instrument — the paper sets out the American record alongside the British one.

4

The debt stays open

Each instalment acknowledges the balance; none of it settles it. Who receives the money is decided by descendant communities and their commissions — CARICOM, the UK, H.R. 40 in the US — not by the debtor.

What would your own tokens pay?

Every token is a sliver of automated labour. See what the levy would raise on yours.
tokens a short chat ≈ 2k a long session ≈ 50k heavy user / month ≈ 5m

Put this clock on your page

Embed on any website or blog:
Post it on Facebook, X, WhatsApp — the number updates every time you copy it:
Copy embed Copy share text

Assumptions — every input is public and editable

THE SOVEREIGN GPU DIVIDEND · read the paper

Copied to clipboard